The Failure Of Leveraged Municipal Bond Hedge Funds
It used to be common practice for hedge funds like 1861 Capital Management, Citigroup’s ASTA/MAT and Stone & Youngberg Municipal Advantage Fund to tout the promise that first built the hedge fund industry: to produce profits even in tough markets. Now it’s a different story altogether. The hype is faded, and the credit crunch has caused more banks to pull credit lines from hedge funds and investors to shun this once-popular-but-secretive corner of the investing world.
For hedge funds that invest in the $2.6 trillion municipal bond market, troubles are even more pronounced. As reported March 1, 2008, by the Wall Street Journal, turmoil in the municipal-bond market has forced a number of hedge funds to unwind complicated bets and in the process unload billions of dollars worth of securities. Among those hedge funds: New York-based 1861 Capital Management.
Municipal bond arbitrage is considered a complicated, risky investing strategy that involves trades of municipal bonds, short-term notes, and interest-rate derivatives. In recent years, a growing number of hedge funds, including 1861 Capital Management, began to employ municipal arbitrage, buying long-term municipal bonds that had slightly higher yields and pocketing the difference. The funds then hedged against large fluctuations in interest rates by essentially reversing that trade, using taxable securities.
Municipal bond arbitrage also entails additional risk because in order to bolster returns, hedge funds must pile on the leverage.
Signs of trouble first appeared at the beginning of 2008, when municipal bond yields became hammered from the downturn in the markets. As a result, many hedge funds suddenly found themselves forced to liquidate their leveraged positions.
It’s these two facts - risk and leverage - that have become a bone of contention for many investors in municipal arbitrage hedge funds. As reported in a January 2009 study from the Securities Litigation and Consulting Group (SLCG) on the recent failure of leveraged municipal bond hedge funds, some 36 hedge funds - 1861 Capital Management among them - were marketed and sold to investors as “high yield, low-risk alternatives” to traditional municipal bond funds.
In reality, nothing could have been further from the truth. All of the hedge funds featured in SLCG’s study contained considerably more risk than investors ever realized. They also produced significantly lower-than-expected returns. In the end, investors suffered to the tune of billions of dollars in losses.
Our affiliation of securities lawyers is actively involved in advising individual and institutional investors in evaluating their legal options when confronted with subprime and other mortgage-related investment losses.