Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/subpr1m3/public_html/blog/wp-settings.php on line 512

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/subpr1m3/public_html/blog/wp-settings.php on line 527

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/subpr1m3/public_html/blog/wp-settings.php on line 534

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/subpr1m3/public_html/blog/wp-settings.php on line 570

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/subpr1m3/public_html/blog/wp-includes/cache.php on line 103

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/subpr1m3/public_html/blog/wp-includes/query.php on line 61

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/subpr1m3/public_html/blog/wp-includes/theme.php on line 1109
Lawsuit Charges Reserve Management Of Misleading Reserve Yield Plus Investors - Investor Insight - Subprime Losses
Please Note: You are viewing the unstyled version of Subprimelosses. Either your browser does not support CSS (Cascading Style Sheets) or it is disabled. As a result, much of this website will not look the way it was intended, although all of its contents will be accessible to you. For more information, visit our Browser Support page.

Skip to Primary Site Navigation, Secondary Site Navigation, Content


Home > Blog > Lawsuit Charges Reserve Management Of Misleading Reserve Yield Plus Investors

Lawsuit Charges Reserve Management Of Misleading Reserve Yield Plus Investors

The final months of 2008 have morphed into a hotbed of legal problems for the Reserve Management Corporation, which is now facing a new federal class-action lawsuit concerning the Yield Plus Fund. Filed in New York on Nov. 25, the lawsuit accuses Reserve Management of misleading thousands of investors in the fund by taking on risky investments, rather than preserving capital as initially advertised.

As reported Nov. 28 in USA Today, the risky investments in the Yield Plus Fund included Lehman Brothers debt. When Lehman filed for bankruptcy protection on Sept. 16, the Yield Plus Fund quickly broke the buck, and redemptions in the $1.1 billion fund were subsequently frozen.

The lawsuit also accuses TD Ameritrade of intentionally misleading clients in the Yield Plus Fund by characterizing the fund as a money market fund. In reality, the Yield Plus Fund is a diversified mutual fund that made high-risk investments as opposed to the conservative nature of a money market investment.

The Yield Plus Fund lawsuit is just one of a number of lawsuits on Reserve Management’s plate. To date, at least 16 other lawsuits have been filed against the company over another fund that it manages, the Reserve Primary Fund. The $64 billion Primary Fund, which is the oldest money-market fund in the United States, became the first fund in 14 years to break the buck after Lehman Brothers filed bankruptcy in September. At the time, Reserve Management told investors that redemptions only would take up to seven days.

Seven days ultimately turned into months. However, unlike the Yield Plus Fund, the Reserve Primary Fund is covered by the government’s bailout out plan. As for investors in the frozen Reserve Yield Plus Fund, their “coverage” is non-existent; instead, they are looking at double-digit losses.

Our affiliation of securities lawyers is actively involved in advising individual and institutional investors in evaluating their legal options when confronted with subprime and other mortgage-related investment losses.

One Response to “Lawsuit Charges Reserve Management Of Misleading Reserve Yield Plus Investors”

  1. John P. Says:

    Reserve Primary Fund is NOT covered by the government’s bailout plan.

Leave a Reply